Difference between revisions of "NAMD Benchmark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!Processor Type!!Freq!!Cores!!Sockets!!Tot Cores!!Days/ns!!Memory Used!!NAMD Version | !Processor Type!!Freq!!Cores!!Sockets!!Tot Cores!!Days/ns!!Memory Used!!NAMD Version | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |colspan=9 |'''Xeon Phi''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Intel Xeon Phi 7210 || 1.3G||256||1||256||4.39648||17654.7MB||2.13 | |Intel Xeon Phi 7210 || 1.3G||256||1||256||4.39648||17654.7MB||2.13 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |colspan=9 || '''Xeon''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Intel Xeon Gold 6142||2.60G||16||2||32|| 2.92143 ||4977.29MB||2.13 | |Intel Xeon Gold 6142||2.60G||16||2||32|| 2.92143 ||4977.29MB||2.13 | ||
Revision as of 12:58, 8 August 2019
NAMD Benchmarks
Another aspect of benchmarking is to utilize actual scientific software. In this case I am using NAMD, a molecular dynamics package that can really stress processors.
Benchmark Results
| CUDA Client | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Processor Type | Freq | Cores | Sockets | Tot Cores | Days/ns | Memory Used | NAMD Version | |
| Xeon Phi | ||||||||
| Intel Xeon Phi 7210 | 1.3G | 256 | 1 | 256 | 4.39648 | 17654.7MB | 2.13 | |
| colspan=9 | Xeon | |||||||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6142 | 2.60G | 16 | 2 | 32 | 2.92143 | 4977.29MB | 2.13 | |
