Difference between revisions of "NAMD Benchmark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Intel Xeon Gold 6142||2.60G||16||2||32|| 2.92143 ||4977.29MB||2.13 | |Intel Xeon Gold 6142||2.60G||16||2||32|| 2.92143 ||4977.29MB||2.13 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Intel Xeon E5-2698v3||2.30G||16||2||32|| 3.72519||4976.82MB||2.13 | ||
Revision as of 13:23, 8 August 2019
NAMD Benchmarks
Another aspect of benchmarking is to utilize actual scientific software. In this case I am using NAMD, a molecular dynamics package that can really stress processors.
Benchmark Results
Days/ns: Lower is better
| Processor Type | Freq | Cores | Sockets | Tot Cores | Days/ns | Memory Used | NAMD Version | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xeon Phi | ||||||||
| Intel Xeon Phi 7210 | 1.3G | 256 | 1 | 256 | 4.39648 | 17654.7MB | 2.13 | |
| Xeon | ||||||||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6142 | 2.60G | 16 | 2 | 32 | 2.92143 | 4977.29MB | 2.13 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2698v3 | 2.30G | 16 | 2 | 32 | 3.72519 | 4976.82MB | 2.13 | |
