Difference between revisions of "NAMD Benchmark"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
=Benchmark Results= | =Benchmark Results= | ||
| + | Days/ns: Lower is better | ||
| + | |||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
!Processor Type!!Freq!!Cores!!Sockets!!Tot Cores!!Days/ns!!Memory Used!!NAMD Version | !Processor Type!!Freq!!Cores!!Sockets!!Tot Cores!!Days/ns!!Memory Used!!NAMD Version | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 8 August 2019
NAMD Benchmarks
Another aspect of benchmarking is to utilize actual scientific software. In this case I am using NAMD, a molecular dynamics package that can really stress processors.
Benchmark Results
Days/ns: Lower is better
| Processor Type | Freq | Cores | Sockets | Tot Cores | Days/ns | Memory Used | NAMD Version | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xeon Phi | ||||||||
| Intel Xeon Phi 7210 | 1.3G | 256 | 1 | 256 | 4.39648 | 17654.7MB | 2.13 | |
| Xeon | ||||||||
| Intel Xeon Gold 6142 | 2.60G | 16 | 2 | 32 | 2.92143 | 4977.29MB | 2.13 | |
